Showing posts with label Smarter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Smarter. Show all posts

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Will Music Really Make Your Child Smarter?


The nineties have been the decade for widespread news about the affects of music on the brain. Everyone seems to be asking about the "Mozart Effect", specifically what it is and how to use it to their child's benefit. It is certainly an exciting time to be a music educator and a parent. We are finally able to look at documented research that shows that music is integral to a child's growth, and use this information to help our children achieve their full potential. What more do we want as parents than to give our children all of the tools necessary to become happy, well-adjusted, intelligent human beings?

Unfortunately, like most popular theories, the "Mozart Effect" has become watered down in an effort by some people to make more money at the expense of the general public. You can go into any bookstore nowadays and buy "Mozart Effect" books, videos, tapes, and even bumper stickers.

In researching this article I did just that at several local music stores, as well as on the internet. I looked first in the music section, and when I didn't find any books on the subject, wandered over to the children's section with my 2 year old daughter. Again, aside from a mixed assortment of compact discs with music for children's brains, I found nothing of real value for research. Curious, I went to the information counter where I was told that the "Mozart Effect" books, written by Don Campell, were to be found in the "alternative medicine" section! And, they were all sold out. That gave me my first clue that something very interesting was happening on this subject. I decided to research further in the library and on the internet.

The term "Mozart Effect" has come to simplify (by Don Campbell et al) a large body of research by neuro-scientists and experimental psychiatrists showing a definitive link between music study and improved spatial intelligence. This is nothing to be taken lightly. Children are born with over 100 billion unconnected or loosely connected nerve cells called neurons. Every experience that child has will strengthen or even create links between neurons. Those pathways that remain unused will, after some time, die. Because neural connections are responsible for every kind of intelligence, a child's brain will develop to its full potential only through exposure to enriching experiences. It is important then, to identify the kinds of enrichment that forges the links between neurons.

Music has been clearly proven to improve neurological connections responsible for spatial intelligence. Spatial intelligence is necessary for a person to be able to see patterns in space and time. It is the ability to perceive the visual world accurately and to form mental images of physical objects. This kind of intelligence is used for higher brain functions such as music, complex math, solving puzzles, reasoning, and chess. Music specialists for years have noted that their musically-trained and involved students tend to be at the top of their class, often outscoring their non-musical classmates in mathematical tasks. Until recently, however, there was no way to clearly prove it.

Definitive studies have been done since the early 1980's when Dr. Gordon Shaw and colleagues presented the trion model of the brain's neuronal structure to the National Academy of Sciences. By 1990 the team had shown through computer experiments that trion firing patterns produce viable music, when these patterns are mapped onto musical pitches. This study was important in that it suggested that this musical model could be used to examine creativity in higher cognitive functions, such as mathematics and chess, which are similar to music. By 1991, Shaw proposed that music could be considered a "pre-language" and that early childhood music training exercises the brain for some higher cognitive structures.

In 1993 at UCal Irvine, Dr. Frances Rauscher, a Columbia PH.D. scientist and former concert cellist, joined the Shaw team in documenting a pilot study of the earlier research, but now directly applying their findings to people. This preliminary study showed that a group of college students temporarily improved their spatial-reasoning skills after listening to a Mozart piano sonata for 10 minutes. The same study applied to preschool children showed a more permanent improvement.

By 1997, the Rauscher-Shaw team had significant evidence suggesting the benefits of music to children's spatial intelligence. The team studied three separate groups of preschoolers. The first group received specialized music training, particularly weekly keyboard lessons; the second group received specialized computer training; the third group received no specialized training at all. After several months, the team tested the children using tests designed to measure spatial tasks. Those children who received the keyboard lessons performed 34% better than the children who had taken either computer lessons, or no lessons. And, the effects of the keyboard training was long-term, suggesting that their may indeed be a learning "window" in early childhood, where we may enhance the connections of neurons forever.

Other research has suggested the same thing--that music training in early childhood indeed helps a child's brain to develop. In the Winter '95 issue of Early Childhood Connections (ECC), Dr. Edwin E. Gordon, talks about a Music Learning Window. He says, "A child will never have a higher level of music aptitude than at the moment of birth... A child's potential to achieve in music remains throughout life where it stabilizes at age 9." Harvard Medical School's Dr. Gottfried Schlaug, found (through magnetic-resonance-imaging of musicians who began training before age 7, began later, and non-musicians) that certain regions of the brain are larger in musicians who started their musical training before age 7.

Now we have an entire scientific collection of data suggesting what music educators have known for centuries-- that music has a definitive effect on children's developments.

So, what do we, as parents, do with this information? Here are some suggestions:

1. Although listening to well-structured and performed music such as Mozart, Beethoven, and Bach certainly is wonderful for exposure to the arts, it is not simply by listening to music that your child's brain develops. All of the research has shown that music TRAINING is required. This means getting your children into music lessons early, while the music learning window is at its peak before age 9. Piano lessons seem to be exceptionally helpful, as the keyboard is symmetrical, balanced, and logical.

2. Support your child's local music programs in schools, churches, synagogues, etc. Here you will find skilled, educated music instructors who will bring new musical experiences to your child, including an appreciation for music in culture, history, and pure listening enjoyment. Demand a quality music education for your children throughout their lives.

3. Reevaluate where music fits into your home. Question why music traditions and activities, once central to family life, have been replaced by mass-market entertainment requiring no familial participation. Get off the couch and onto the floor and sing, dance, play instruments with your child.




Paula Penna, MMed., BMus. is the owner and director of MusicMakers, LLC and The MusicMakers Academy in Manchester, CT. She has a Masters degree in Music Education and Arts Administration from Florida State University, and a Bachelors degree in Music Education and art history. She is a publicly certified music teacher (pre K-12, choral, orchestral, and band). After teaching in the public schools in Westchester County, NY she worked as the Associate Director of Educational Outreach at the famed Manhattan School of Music (university level) where she wrote curriculum and trained the graduate students in how to teach music.

While at MSM she worked with teaching artists such as John Bertles, Pinkus Zuckerman, Itzhak Perlman, and Herbie Hancock to help bring music into the inner city schools which did not have music programs. She also sat on the Arts Roundtable of New York City, often encouraging advocacy for music education for all children. Moving to Connecticut to have her first child in 1996, she started MusicMakers Lessons at Home, which eventually grew to MusicMakers Academy, a classical music school with a progressive attitude. She resides in Connecticut where she is currently working on publishing her own books and resources for music education and etiquette.




Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The IQ in Music - Do Music Lessons For Your Kids Make Them Smarter?


Simply listening to classical music - the so-called 'Mozart effect' - does not make you smarter. I have presented the grounds for this conclusion elsewhere. In this article we take a look at the question, "Do music lessons make a child smarter? Do music lessons have 'collateral benefits' that extend to non-musical areas of intelligence? Do music lessons increase a child's overall IQ level, making them better at reasoning, math and language comprehension?" How this question has been answered is as interesting as what the answer turns out to be.

Why is this question of interest?

Here is one answer. Children have limited free time to invest into extra-curricular activities, and parents have to make choices between activities for their children. If the choice is between, for example, ballet and music lessons, and music is known to increase intelligence but ballet is not, this might be reason enough to choose music over ballet. Ballet may be good for reasons that music may not be - for motor coordination skills, for example - but at least now the parent has a firmer basis on which choose.

How can we CANNOT answer the question: Do music lessons improve IQ?

The question 'do music lessons make a child smarter?' isn't something that can be answered through common sense and the facts of personal experience. It may be tempting to reason from your observation that all the children you know who take music lessons are doing well at school, that these lessons must be helping them develop their intelligence and school success. But this conclusion isn't justified. Why not? Because it's just as likely that they are both doing better at school and taking music because they are from a certain socioeconomic class where the average IQ is higher to begin with. Children with high IQs are more likely than other children to take music lessons because better educated and more affluent parents tend to provide music lessons for their children - it's part of the culture of the more educated and affluent to provide music lessons. Not all educated and affluent parents, but a lot of them. But this doesn't necessarily mean that music lessons have any impact on the childrens' developing intelligence. Many educated and affluent parents also buy certain brands of clothes for their children, but the clothes children wear don't make them more intelligent.

So we cannot go about trying to figure out whether taking music lessons improves IQ like this.

How we CAN answer the question: Do music lessons improve IQ?

To find out the answer to this question we need to do an experiment. We need to set things up like this: take a lot of children from a variety of backgrounds and randomly assign (by the flip of a coin) half of these children to music lessons for a year, and half to some other extracurricular activity for a year - for instance ballet, or football. We test both groups of children on an IQ test before the lessons, and then again after the lessons, and see if there is a difference between the two groups. If there is a difference - if those who took music lessons on average score higher on the IQ test - we know that it's not due to family background (because family backgrounds are mixed evenly across the two groups). If we find a difference we will also be more confident that the intelligence gain is specific to music and not any extra curricular activity (whether music, drama, ballet, karate or soccer). In essence, by doing this kind of 'critical experiment' we make sure that we've pinpointed the effect of the music lessons on intelligence.

Schellenberg's critical experiment

In 2004 someone did finally this scientific experiment: Glenn Schellenberg from the Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. He put an advertisement in a local, community newspaper, offering free, weekly arts lessons for 6 year olds for a year. 144 children were then assigned randomly to one of four different groups, with 36 children in each group. Group 1 was given keyboard lessons, Group 2 was given voice/singing lessons, Group 3 was given drama lessons, and Group 4 had no extra-curricular lessons. The instructors were trained, female professionals. The children in all groups took an intelligence test called the WISC-III both before and after the year of lessons. The WISC-III is the most highly regarded and widely used intelligence test for children. All four groups had the same average IQ level at the start of the experiment. Children in each group differed in their intelligence level of course, but the average intelligence of each group was the same. This is obviously important for us to draw any conclusions about the effects of the different types of lessons.

And what did Schellenberg find? Do music lessons increase IQ?

The first interesting finding was that all four groups of children showed an increase in IQ level after the year was up, even the group that took no lessons whatsoever. What explains this general increase in IQ for all children? An increase of IQ known to be a usual consequence of entering grade school. Since all these children started grade school during the period of the experiment, it is easy to explain this general IQ increase as due to simple attendance at school.

But - and this is the crux - the two music lesson groups had significantly greater gains in IQ than the drama and 'no-lesson' groups. We can conclude from this data that taking music lessons, but not drama lessons, caused gains in intelligence in addition to the gains obtained by attending school. The type of music lesson didn't matter (whether keyboard or voice); both groups had the same average IQ score after a year of lessons. And both music groups had a 3 point higher IQ score compared to the drama and n0-lesson groups who didn't differ from each other in their IQ score.

This relative superiority of IQ in the music groups was not confined to one particular aspect of intelligence - such as spatial intelligence - but was found in all all but 2 of the 12 subtests of the WISC-III intelligence test, across a broad range of cognitive abilities that require intelligence. It benefited all subtests of what is known as fluid intelligence - the ability to reason and find relationships in a way that does not depend on background knowledge.

The size of the effect: How should we judge it?

3 IQ points doesn't sound like a big effect, but there is a way of looking at this gain in IQ that help put it in perspective and help us evaluate its importance. Compare it to the gain of first going to grade school. The average IQ gain of going to school was about 4 points. The additional gain of taking music lessons (3 points) was, therefore, nearly as much as the full experience of school itself. This is now looking like quite a big effect.

What is special about music?

We need to be clear about one thing. Schellenberg's experiment shows that music lessons improve IQ for six year olds. It does not tell us that music lessons improve IQ for older children or for adults unfortunately. Six year old's brains are known to be highly 'plastic' - that is, these young brains can be shaped and reorganised to a large extent by experience. Older children and adults have less brain plasticity and it might be predicted that a year of music lessons in this case would have less of an impact on general intelligence - although we don't know for sure.

In taking music lessons, knowledge and skill relating to music increases, and this is important in itself. But what Schellenberg's experiment shows is that in addition to this, general cognitive ability is also trained and improved - indirectly. Taking music lessons is good 'brain training' at this age! Music lessons involve long periods of focused attention, daily practice, reading musical notation, memorization of extended musical passages, learning about a variety of musical structures (e.g., scales, chords), and progressive mastery fine-motor skills. It is not known exactly which combination of these skills improves general intelligence, and further studies will have to investigate this question.




The author, Dr Mark A. Smith, is a cognitive neuroscientist, author and entrepreneur. Between 2000 and 2003 he was a Lecturer in the Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Cambridge. His most recent position has been as Assistant Professor at Bilkent University, Turkey. His current research is in fluid intelligence and its evolution in human cognition. He has recently set up a cognitive interventions laboratory for experimental research into brain training tools and brain nutrition.

To find out more of what is known about intelligence and how to increase IQ, visit his website:
http://www.iqlift.com/